Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8745415›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society1996

Topology prediction of membrane proteins.

B Persson, P Argos

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In silico studies on DARC.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2009
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A new approach to the prediction of transmembrane structures.Chinese science bulletin = Kexue tongbao · 2008
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

B PerssonEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. persson@embl-heidelberg.de
P Argos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new method is described for prediction of protein membrane topology (intra- and extracellular sidedness) from multiply aligned amino acid sequences after determination of the membrane-spanning segments. The prediction technique relies on residue compositional differences in the protein segments exposed at each side of the membrane. Intra/extracellular ratios are calculated for the residue types Asn, Asp, Gly, Phe, Pro, Trp, Tyr, and Val, preferably found on the extracellular side, and for Ala, Arg, Cys, and Lys, mostly occurring on the intracellular side. The consensus over these 12 residue distributions is used for sidedness prediction. The method was developed with a test set of 42 protein families, for which all but one were correctly predicted with the new algorithm. This represents an improvement over predictions based on the widely used "positive-inside rule" and other techniques, where at least six mispredictions were observed for the same data set. Further, application of this and other methods to 12 protein families not in the test set still showed the better performance of the present technique, which was subsequently applied to another set of membrane protein families where the topology has yet to be determined.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationAmino AcidsMembrane ProteinsProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Amino AcidAmino AcidsMembrane ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID8745415
PMCPMC2143341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.