Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8744314›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1996

Constrained diffusion or immobile fraction on cell surfaces: a new interpretation.

T J Feder, I Brust-Mascher, J P Slattery, B Baird, W W Webb

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 473 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Local GPCR density tips the balance of μ-opioid receptor trafficking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. p14Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. p14Research square · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. NCK1 Modulates Neuronal Actin Dynamics and Promotes Dendritic Spine, Synapse, and Memory Formation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T J FederDepartment of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
I Brust-Mascher
J P Slattery
B Baird
W W Webb
Cornell University · US

Funding

YIELD SINGLE MOLECULE IN FCS COLLECTION VOLUME BY NUMERICAL SIMULATIONP41RR004224 · NCRR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI WEBB, WATT W · 1988 to 2002
$3.1M
INDUCTION OF XENOGRAFT TOLERANCE VIA THYMIC TRANSPLANTSF32AI010306 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GLEIT, ZACHARY L · 1999 to 2000
$30k
NCRR NIH HHS P41RR04224NIAID NIH HHS AI10306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein lateral mobility in cell membranes is generally measured using fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR). Since the development of this technique, the data have been interpreted by assuming free Brownian diffusion of cell surface receptors in two dimensions, an interpretation that requires that a subset of the diffusing species remains immobile. The origin of this so-called immobile fraction remains a mystery. In FPR, the motions of thousands of particles are inherently averaged, inevitably masking the details of individual motions. Recently, tracking of individual cell surface receptors has identified several distinct types of motion (Gross and Webb, 1988; Ghosh and Webb, 1988, 1990, 1994; Kusumi et al. 1993; Qian et al. 1991; Slattery, 1995), thereby calling into question the classical interpretation of FPR data as free Brownian motion of a limited mobile fraction. We have measured the motion of fluorescently labeled immunoglobulin E complexed to high affinity receptors (Fc epsilon RI) on rat basophilic leukemia cells using both single particle tracking and FPR. As in previous studies, our tracking results show that individual receptors may diffuse freely, or may exhibit restricted, time-dependent (anomalous) diffusion. Accordingly, we have analyzed FPR data by a new model to take this varied motion into account, and we show that the immobile fraction may be due to particles moving with the anomalous subdiffusion associated with restricted lateral mobility. Anomalous subdiffusion denotes random molecular motion in which the mean square displacements grow as a power law in time with a fractional positive exponent less than one. These findings call for a new model of cell membrane structure.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCell LineCell MembraneDiffusionFluorescent DyesMembrane LipidsMembrane ProteinsModels, BiologicalRatsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, IgEFluorescent DyesMembrane LipidsMembrane ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, IgE

Identifiers

PMID8744314
PMCPMC1225256
OpenAlexW2002478108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.