Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8741231›Full record

ReviewDrugs1996

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current and future treatment strategies.

B W Festoff

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pediatric psychopharmacology: too much or too little?World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2013
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

B W FestoffNeurobiology Research Laboratory, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Veterans Health Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, enigmatic disorder characterised by relentless progression of muscle wasting and weakness until death ensues due to respiratory muscle failure. Intellectual functions are usually spared. ALS, known also as motor neuron disease (MND) in the UK, maladie de Charcot in France and Lou Gehrig's disease in the US, is usually sporadic, but between 5 and 10% of all cases are hereditary, usually inherited as autosomal dominant. Previously thought to be untreatable, as well as incurable, just in the last 3 years ALS has been the greatest clinical application of recent exciting break-throughs in preclinical neurobiology research. Although definitive information regarding the cause(s) and pathogenesis of ALS still escapes us, meaningful demonstration of intercession in the downhill course with specific therapy has been suggested, giving reason to be hopeful, if cautiously and critically optimistic. This review focuses on the recent work from the fields of growth/trophic factors, glutamate/neurotoxicity, neuroprotection and proteases and inhibitors, as well as the approaches to measuring specific effects in patients with the illness. It ends with a eye to the horizon, and the future, and where ALS treatment strategies may be heading after the millennium.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisApoptosisCiliary Neurotrophic FactorClinical Trials as TopicHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor INerve Tissue ProteinsRiluzoleThiazolesCiliary Neurotrophic FactorInsulin-Like Growth Factor INerve Tissue ProteinsRiluzoleThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID8741231
OpenAlexW2121497477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.