Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8740528›Full record

ArticleBasic research in cardiology

Mechanical restitution and recirculation fraction in cardiac myocytes and left ventricular muscle of adult rats.

U Ravens, C Mahl, A Ohler, S M Hardman, M I Noble

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Basic research in cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

U RavensInstitut für Pharmakologie Universität-Gesamthochschule Essen, FRG.
C Mahl
A Ohler
S M Hardman
M I Noble
Essen University Hospital · DECharing Cross Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unloaded cell shortening was measured in electrically stimulated myocytes from adult rat hearts to compare the contractile response to stimulation with that in isometrically contracting left ventricular papillary muscles under similar experimental conditions, but preloaded to produce maximum twitch tension. Mechanical restitution in cells followed a biexponential function with time constants of 0.19 +/- 0.03 s and 36.4 +/- 10.2 s (7 cells from 5 hearts, n = 7/5). The time constants for papillary muscles were 0.58 +/- 0.05 s and 14.6 +/- 1.0 s (n = 6/6). In myocytes, maximum post-rest potentiation occurred after 30 to 60 s of rest. The potentiation after 60 s of rest was 2.48 +/- 0.31 times the steadystate in cells and 2.63 +/- 0.16 in papillary muscles. Recirculation fraction of C2+ as calculated from the decay of post-rest potentiation was 0.84 +/- 0.04 in single cells and 0.59 +/- 0.02 in papillary muscles (p < 0.005). Caffeine (3mM) abolished post-rest potentiation in both types of preparations. The numerical values for the time constants of mechanical restitution, potentiation factor and recirculation fraction in papillary muscles did not depend on preload. It is concluded that interval-dependent changes of contractility are preserved in single cardiac cells but the kinetics of decay of potentiation appear to have changed quantitatively.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCaffeineCells, CulturedElectric StimulationMyocardial ContractionMyocardiumPapillary MusclesRatsRats, WistarVentricular Function, LeftCaffeine

Identifiers

PMID8740528
OpenAlexW2071534494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.