Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8736621›Full record

ReviewDrugs1996

Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability.

R Davis, A Markham, J A Balfour

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05916105 (Drug Utilization Evaluation Study of Ciprofloxacin Utilization and Adverse Events Occurrence in Community Pharmacy Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05916105 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Drug Utilization Evaluation Study of Ciprofloxacin Utilization and Adverse Events Occurrence in Community Pharmacy Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDamanhour UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled151ConditionsCiprofloxacin Adverse ReactionArmsCiprofloxacin Tablets
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 384 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Prulifloxacin.Drugs · 2004
    Trial
  5. Effect of ciprofloxacin on the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2003
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Uncertainty undermines the validity of antimicrobial pharmacodynamics.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Drug Utilization Evaluation Study of Ciprofloxacin Use and Adverse Events Occurrence: Role of Community Pharmacists.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sprayable ciprofloxacin-loaded poloxamer hydrogels for wound infection treatment.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2023
    Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R DavisAdis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
A Markham
J A Balfour

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ciprofloxacin is a broad spectrum fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. Since its introduction in the 1980s, most Gram-negative bacteria have remained highly susceptible to this agent in vitro; Gram-positive bacteria are generally susceptible or moderately susceptible. Ciprofloxacin attains therapeutic concentrations in most tissues and body fluids. The results of clinical trials with ciprofloxacin have confirmed its clinical efficacy and low potential for adverse effects. Ciprofloxacin is effective in the treatment of a wide variety of infections, particularly those caused by Gram-negative pathogens. These include complicated urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases (gonorrhoea and chancroid), skin and bone infections, gastrointestinal infections caused by multiresistant organisms, lower respiratory tract infections (including those in patients with cystic fibrosis), febrile neutropenia (combined with an agent which possesses good activity against Gram-positive bacteria), intra-abdominal infections (combined with an antianaerobic agent) and malignant external otitis. Ciprofloxacin should not be considered a first-line empirical therapy for respiratory tract infections if penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae is the primary pathogen; however, it is an appropriate treatment option in patients with mixed infections (where S. pneumoniae may or may not be present) or in patients with predisposing factors for Gram-negative infections. Clinically important drug interactions involving ciprofloxacin are well documented and avoidable with conscientious prescribing. Recommended dosage adjustments in patients with impaired renal function vary between countries; major adjustments are not required until the estimated creatinine clearance is < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 (or when the serum creatinine level is > or = 2 mg/dl). Ciprofloxacin is one of the few broad spectrum antibacterials available in both intravenous and oral formulations. In this respect, it offers the potential for cost savings with sequential intravenous and oral therapy in appropriately selected patients and may allow early discharge from hospital in some instances. In conclusion, ciprofloxacin has retained its excellent activity against most Gram-negative bacteria, and fulfilled its potential as an important antibacterial drug in the treatment of a wide range of infections. Rational prescribing will help to ensure the continued clinical usefulness of this valuable antimicrobial drug.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCiprofloxacinCommunicable DiseasesDrug InteractionsDrug ToleranceEconomics, PharmaceuticalHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Infective AgentsCiprofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID8736621
OpenAlexW2036488991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.