Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8732729›Full record

ReviewThe Western journal of medicine1996

Cost-effective therapy for hypertension.

W Barrie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Western journal of medicine, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

W BarrieDepartment of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Michigan School Medicine, Ann Arbor, 48105, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The costs of treating hypertension are out of control. The Joint National Committee on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure and others recommend the use of diuretics and beta-blockers as first-line agents. Newer drugs such as calcium channel blockers, alpha-blockers, and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors have improved metabolic profiles, but have not been proved in long-term, randomized, controlled trials to reduce morbidity and mortality. Our General Medicine Clinic has gradually shifted toward prescribing the newer agents. We reviewed our drug use, evaluated the literature, and made recommendations in the form of guidelines. Clinicians' concerns included quality-of-life issues, sexual dysfunction, metabolic changes--lipids, potassium, insulin resistance--and others. These concerns were addressed, and a consensus was reached. Our goal is to streamline therapy, reduce costs, and provide proven effective medication.

Indexed as

Drug Utilization ReviewAntihypertensive AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost ControlDiabetes MellitusDrug CostsHumansHypertensionMichiganPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of LifeUnited StatesAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID8732729
PMCPMC1303503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.