Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8726967›Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research1996

Synaptic degeneration and remodelling after fast kindling of the olfactory bulb.

D P Woldbye, T G Bolwig, J Kragh, O S Jørgensen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D P WoldbyeDepartment of Psychiatry, National University Hospital: Rigshospitalet-6234, Copenhagen, Denmark.
T G Bolwig
J Kragh
O S Jørgensen
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kindling of the olfactory bulb using a novel fast protocol (within 24 h) was studied in rats. In target brain regions, the effects of kindling were measured on the concentration of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) by dot-blot and on the concentrations of neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) and the 25 kDa synaptosomal associated protein of the D3 immunoprecipitate (D3(SNAP-25)) by crossed immunoelectrophoresis. Bilateral increases in the levels of GFAP, indicating activation of astrocytes, were detected in primary olfactory cortical projection areas, including the piriform cortex, and also in the basolateral amygdala and dentate gyrus, suggesting that these regions may be functionally altered during the kindling process. In the piriform cortex and dentate gyrus increased NCAM/D3(SNAP-25) ratios found ipsilaterally at seven days after kindling probably reflect an elevated rate of synaptic remodelling. At this time, however, an overall pattern of ipsilateral decreases in the synaptic marker proteins NCAM and D3(SNAP-25) indicated that this remodelling occurred on a background of synaptic degeneration. These results confirm previous studies showing that kindling is associated with synaptic remodelling and neuronal degeneration in the hippocampal formation and extends the area of plasticity to include the piriform cortex which is believed to be central to the kindling process.

Indexed as

Kindling, NeurologicMembrane ProteinsAnimalsAstrocytesBiomarkersBrainGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinImmunoelectrophoresis, Two-DimensionalMaleNerve DegenerationNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesOlfactory BulbOrgan SpecificityRatsRats, WistarBiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesSnap25 protein, ratSynaptosomal-Associated Protein 25

Identifiers

PMID8726967
OpenAlexW2088950166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.