Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1996
Population pharmacokinetic study of teicoplanin in severely neutropenic patients.
Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of teicoplanin in children with malignant haematological disease.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Trial
- Randomized comparison of serum teicoplanin concentrations following daily or alternate daily dosing in healthy adults.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2004Trial
- Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2004Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sequential intravenous and subcutaneous teicoplanin in critically ill patients without vasopressors.Intensive care medicine · 2003Trial
- Population pharmacokinetic study of amikacin administered once or twice daily to febrile, severely neutropenic adults.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 1998Trial
- Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based model for predicting teicoplanin plasma concentrations in intensive care unit patients with pulmonary infections: a retrospective study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Teicoplanin at the Onset of Febrile Neutropenia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of teicoplanin in critically ill patients with sepsis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Contribution of Population Pharmacokinetics of Glycopeptides and Antifungals to Dosage Adaptation in Paediatric Onco-hematological Malignancies: A Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in Preterm and Term Neonates: Is It Time for a New Dosing Regimen?Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- Pharmacodynamic comparison of different antimicrobial regimens against Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Antimicrobial treatment of febrile neutropenia: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2013Review
- Review
- Teicoplanin dosing strategy for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus in Korean patients with neutropenic fever.Yonsei medical journal · 2011Article
- Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2010Review
- Ceftazidime in acute myeloid leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia: helpfulness of continuous intravenous infusion in maximizing pharmacodynamic exposure.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2005Article
- Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2005Review
- Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2000Review
- Implementation and evaluation of a stochastic control strategy for individualizing teicoplanin dosage regimen.Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The teicoplanin pharmacokinetics (PK) of 30 febrile and severely neutropenic patients (polymorphonuclear count, < 500/mm3) with hematologic malignancies were compared with those determined for five healthy volunteers (HV). Neutropenic patients were given piperacillin combined with amikacin, and teicoplanin was added to the regimen the day fever developed in patients suspected of having a staphylococcal infection or 48 h later. Teicoplanin was given intravenously at a dosage of 6 mg/kg of body weight at 0, 12, and 24 h and once a day thereafter. Five to eleven blood samples per patient were collected. Teicoplanin concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography. A bicompartmental model was fitted to the data by a nonlinear mixed-effect-model approach. Multiple-linear regression analysis was applied in an attempt to correlate PK parameters to nine covariates. The mean trough concentrations of teicoplanin 48 h after the onset of treatment and 24 h after the last injection (last trough) +/- standard deviations were 8.8 +/- 4.1 and 17.5 +/- 13.5 mg/liter, respectively. A significant increase was noted in the mean rate of elimination clearance of teicoplanin in neutropenic patients compared with that of HV (0.86 versus 0.73 liter/h, P = 0.002), as was the case with rates of distribution clearance (5.89 versus 4.94 liter/h, P = 0.002); the mean half-life of distribution was significantly shorter in patients than in HV (0.43 versus 0.61 h, P = 0.002). In contrast, the volumes of the central compartment (ca. 5.8 liters for both groups), the volumes of distribution at steady state (HV, 37.6 liters; patients, 55.9 liters), and the elimination half-lives (HV, 39.6 h; patients, 52.7 h) were not significantly different between HV and neutropenic patients. Interindividual variabilities of rates of clearance (coefficient of variation [CV], 43%) and elimination half-lives (CV, 56%) were mainly explained by the variabilities among rates of creatinine clearance. Interindividual variabilities of the volumes of the central compartment (CV, 33%) and the volumes of distribution at steady state (CV = 51%) were correlated to interindividual variabilities among numbers of leukocytes and the ages of patients, respectively. On the basis of the population PK model of teicoplanin, simulations were made to optimize the dosing schedule. A supplemental 6 mg/kg dose of teicoplanin at 36 h resulted in a trough concentration at 48 h of 16.0 +/- 4.5 mg/liter, with only 7% of patients having a trough concentration of less than 10 mg/liter, compared with 46% of patients on the usual schedule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.