Trial reportJournal of endocrinological investigation1995
Temporal relationship between bone loss and increased bone turnover: a longitudinal study following natural menopause.
Trial report in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monitoring estrogen replacement therapy and identifying rapid bone losers with an immunoassay for deoxypyridinoline.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 1998Trial
- Circulating markers of bone turnover.Journal of nephrology · 2017Review
- Microdamage and bone strength.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the results of a longitudinal study aimed at better defining concomitant changes of both bone mineral density (BMD) and of four independent markers of bone turnover (serum osteocalcin, serum alkaline phosphatase activity, fasting urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine and calcium/creatinine ratio) following natural menopause. The results obtained indicate that, within a relatively short period of time since cessation of gonadal function, conventional markers of bone turnover behave differently. In fact, while the mean values of hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio (felt to be a marker of bone resorption) rise immediately at the first control (19.7 +/- 11.7 months), the bone formation markers gradually increase and, as far as serum osteocalcin levels are concerned, this increment appears to be long-lasting. As a result of these changes, a negative skeletal balance follows, which is documented by the prolonged reduction of bone mineral density during the entire observation period. Mean +/- SD % measured yearly bone loss was -2.83 +/- 2.6. There was a highly significant correlation between initial and final BMD values (r = 0.908, p < 0.001; r2 = 82.5) and a weak inverse correlation (r = -0.298, p < 0.046) between initial serum alkaline phosphatase values and % yearly bone loss. In conclusion, measurement of the biological indices of bone remodelling following natural menopause indicate that the increase in osteogenesis is delayed compared to that of bone resorption; furthermore, in the immediate postmenopausal period, the actual bone mass should be considered the best predictor of future bone mass. The inverse correlation found between % yearly bone loss and serum alkaline phosphatase values seems to emphasize the importance of increased bone turnover as an independent predictor of bone loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.