ArticleThe Biochemical journal1996
An uncleaved glycosylphosphatidylinositol signal mediates Ca(2+)-sensitive protein degradation.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Inv-gp80 is a chimeric protein which contains a signal for the attachment of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor. When expressed in Dictyostelium discoideum, this protein fails to become GPI anchored and is retained within the cell as an integral membrane protein. We have compared the subcellular localization and degradation of Inv-gp80 with that of its intracellular but soluble counterpart, Inv-gp80sc. Inv-gp80sc lacks the hydrophobic C-terminal 22 amino acids of Inv-gp80. The N-linked oligosaccharides of both Inv-gp80 and Inv-gp80sc remained sensitive to endoglycosidase H, and both proteins co-fractionated with endoplasmic reticulum marker enzymes on Percoll gradients. Under normal conditions, Inv-gp80 displayed a half-life (t 1/2) of 90 min, while Inv-gp80sc displayed a t 1/2 of 120 min. The degradation of both proteins required ATP, was inhibited by tosyl phenylalanylchloromethane (Tos-Phe-CH2Cl) and was insensitive to inhibitors of lysosomal function. While depletion of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum had no effect on the degradation of Inv-gp80sc, it stimulated the degradation of Inv-gp80. When the GPI anchor signal sequence of Inv-gp80 was replaced with the transmembrane domain of the interleukin-2 receptor, the degradation of the protein was no longer influenced by Ca2+ fluxes. The data suggest that while the GPI anchor sequence of Inv-gp80 does not contain determinants regulating the degradation of the protein under basal conditions, it targets Inv-gp80 for rapid degradation under conditions where Ca2+ is depleted from the endoplasmic reticulum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.