Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8707315›Full record

ReviewGenitourinary medicine1996

Balanitis and balanoposthitis: a review.

S Edwards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genitourinary medicine, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Penile Inflammatory Skin Disorders and the Preventive Role of Circumcision.International journal of preventive medicine · 2017
    Review
  6. Pseudoepitheliomatous, Keratotic and Micaceous Balanitis: A Case Report.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2015
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Candida infections of the genitourinary tract.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2010
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Balanitis and balanoposthitis: a review.Genitourinary medicine · 1996
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Newborn male circumcision.Paediatrics & child health
    Article
  17. Approach to balanitis/balanoposthitis: Current guidelines.Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S EdwardsDepartment of Genitourinary Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo give an overview of the literature on balanitis, with a special emphasis on infective causes.

methodA data search was performed using the OVID CD plus Medline 1967-1995, using balanitis and balanoposthitis as textword search strategy. Specific subjects such as anaerobic infection, Zoon's balanitis were sought separately and subgroups combined. Original articles and abstracts were referenced to illustrate each condition. These were mainly English language articles, but included appropriate non-English language papers.

conclusionsBalanitis is a common condition among genitourinary medicine clinic attendees, the cause often remaining undiagnosed. Many cases are caused by infection, with candida being the most frequently diagnosed. However, gardnerella and anaerobic infections are common, and there are a wide variety of other rarer infective causes. In addition irritant balanitis is probably a contributing factor in many cases. Balanitis which persists and in which the cause remains unclear warrants biopsy.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBalanitisHumansLichen Sclerosus et AtrophicusMaleMycosesProtozoan InfectionsVirus Diseases

Identifiers

PMID8707315
PMCPMC1195642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.