ArticlePlant molecular biology1996
Molecular analysis of the gene family of the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA of tomato.
Article in Plant molecular biology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the sound-modulated delay in tomato ripening through expression analysis of coding and non-coding RNAs.Annals of botany · 2018Article
- Synthesis and processing of tRNA-related SINE transcripts in Arabidopsis thaliana.Nucleic acids research · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sequence variants of the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA gene family from four tomato cultivars have been isolated and characterized which indicated the existence of SRP RNA pseudogenes. Sequence analysis revealed two conserved sequence motifs in the upstream region, a TATA-like box and an upstream sequence element (USE), 'TCCCACATCG', both located at a conserved distance to the transcription start point. These elements are identical to the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase III (pol III)-specific promoters of U-rich small nuclear RNA (UsnRNA) genes of plants. Moreover, T-rich stretches are found at the 3' end of the coding regions of the SRP RNA genes which could act as typical pol III termination signals. These findings and recent results from site-directed mutation analysis of the SRP RNA genes from Arabidopsis thaliana indicate that, in contrast to mammalian systems, plant pol III SRP RNA genes are most probably regulated by external promoter elements. According to the identical promoter organization between plant U3-, U6snRNA, MRP-like RNA and SRP RNA genes, one can group these genes into the 'pol III(EXT)USE' subclass of externally regulated USE-dependent pol III genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.