Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8703648›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1995

Comparison of the effects of desipramine on noradrenaline- and methoxamine-evoked venoconstriction in man.

A H Abdelmawla, R W Langley, E Szabadi, C M Bradshaw

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A H AbdelmawlaDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
R W Langley
E Szabadi
C M Bradshaw

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The dorsal hand vein compliance technique was used to investigate the dual effect of tricyclic antidepressants at the noradrenergic synapse (i.e. noradrenaline uptake blockade leading to potentiation and alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade leading to antagonism of the effect of noradrenaline). The effects of a single oral dose (100 mg) of desipramine (DMI) on venoconstrictor responses to locally infused noradrenaline and methoxamine, a selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist with little affinity for the uptake mechanism, were examined. 2. Eight healthy male volunteers participated in four weekly experimental sessions. Each session was associated with one of the following treatment conditions: noradrenaline/DMI, noradrenaline/placebo, methoxamine/DMI, methoxamine/placebo. Subjects were allocated randomly to treatments and sessions according to a double-blind balanced design. Noradrenaline acid tartrate (0.33-33 ng min-1) and methoxamine hydrochloride (0.0135-135 micrograms min-1) were infused into the superficial dorsal hand vein; each dose was infused for 5-7 min with 5 min intervening washout periods. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were recorded before the infusion and immediately after the infusion of the highest dose. Salivation, an index of anticholinergic activity of the antidepressant, was measured by the dental roll technique. 3. Both noradrenaline and methoxamine produced dose-dependent venoconstriction: the geometric mean ED50 for noradrenaline was 4.41 ng min-1 and for methoxamine was 2558 ng min-1; the potency ratio (noradrenaline/methoxamine) was 2884. DMI shifted the dose-response curve for noradrenaline to the left (ANOVA: P < 0.025), resulting in a dose-ratio of 0.26. DMI did not affect the dose-response curve for methoxamine significantly; the dose ratio was 1.24. 4. None of the local infusions and/or systemic treatments had any significant effects on supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate. 5. DMI caused a substantial (47.6%) reduction in salivary output that significantly differed from the slight statistically insignificant increase (5.8%) of salivary output recorded after placebo. 6. These results show that a single oral dose (100 mg) of DMI causes significant potentiation of the response to noradrenaline without significantly affecting the response to methoxamine. The potentiation is likely to be due to uptake blockade since the response to methoxamine was not affected. Furthermore, the lack of significant antagonism of the response to methoxamine indicates that a single oral dose (100 mg) of DMI does not cause sufficient alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade to be detected as a pharmacodynamic change in our test system.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAdultBlood PressureDesipramineDrug InteractionsHandHeart RateHumansMaleMethoxamineNorepinephrineSalivationVasoconstrictionAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsDesipramineMethoxamineNorepinephrine

Identifiers

PMID8703648
PMCPMC1365190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.