ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1996
Mu opioid receptor-like sequences are present throughout vertebrate evolution.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generalizability and representativeness: Considerations for internet-based research on substance use behaviors.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Genetic and functional analysis of a Pacific hagfish opioid system.Journal of neuroscience research · 2022Article
- Article
- The genetics of the opioid system and specific drug addictions.Human genetics · 2012Review
- Estradiol interacts with an opioidergic network to achieve rapid modulation of a vocal pattern generator.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2010Article
- The evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2009Review
- Evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The sequence of the mu opioid receptor is highly conserved among human, rat, and mouse. In order to gain insights into the evolution of the mu opioid receptor, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to screen genomic DNA from a number of different species using degenerate oligonucleotides which recognize a highly conserved region. DNA was assayed from representative species of both the protostome and deuterostome branches of the metazoan phylogenetic tree. Mu opioid receptor-like sequences were found in all vertebrate species that were analyzed. These species included bovine, chicken, bullfrog, striped bass, thresher shark, and Pacific hagfish. However, no mu opioid receptor-like sequences were detected from protostomes or from any invertebrates. The PCR results demonstrate that the region of the mu opioid receptor gene between the first intracellular loop and the third transmembrane domain (TM3) has been highly conserved during evolution and that mu opioid receptor-like sequences are present in the earliest stages of vertebrate evolution. Additional opioid receptor-like sequence was obtained from mRNA isolated from Pacific hagfish brain using rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). The sequence of the Pacific hagfish was most homologous with the human mu opioid receptor (72% at the amino acid level between intracellular loop 1 and transmembrane domain 6) although over the same region high homology was also observed with the delta opioid receptor (69%), the kappa receptor (63%), and opioid receptor-like (ORL1) (59%). The hagfish sequence showed low conservation with the mammalian opioid receptors in the first and second extracellular loops but high conservation in the transmembrane and intracellular domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.