Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8696199›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996

Home visiting by general practitioners in England and Wales.

P Aylin, F A Majeed, D G Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Home sweet home: GPs' response to an increase in the fee size for home visits.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. GP home visits: essential patient care or disposable relic?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P AylinOffice for National Statistics, London. paul.aylin@ons.gov.uk
F A Majeed
D G Cook

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use data from the fourth national survey of morbidity in general practice to investigate the association between home visiting rates and patients' characteristics.

designSurvey of diagnostic data on all home visits by general practitioners.

setting60 general practices in England and Wales. SUBJECTS: 502 493 patients visited at home between September 1991 and August 1992.

main outcome measuresHome visiting rates per 1000 patient years and home visiting ratios standardised for age and sex.

results10.1% (139 801/1 378 510) of contacts with general practitioners took place in patients' homes. The average annual home visiting rate was 299/1000 patient years. Rates showed a J shaped relation with age and were lowest in people aged 16-24 years (103/1000) and highest in people aged > or = 85 years (3009/1000). 1.3% of patients were visited five or more times and received 39% of visits. Age and sex standardised home visiting ratios increased from 69 (95% confidence interval 68 to 70) in social class I to 129 (128 to 130) in social class V. The commonest diagnostic group was diseases of the respiratory system. In older age groups, diseases of the circulatory system was also a common diagnostic group. Standardised home visiting ratios for the 60 practices in the study varied nearly eightfold, from 28 to 218 (interquartile range 67 to 126).

conclusionsHome visits remain an important component of general practitioners' workload. As well as the strong associations between home visiting rates and patient characteristics, there were also large differences between practices in home visiting rates. A small number of patients received a disproportionately high number of home visits. Further investigation of patients with high home visiting rates may help to explain the large differences in workload between general practices and help in allocation of resources to practices.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleHouse CallsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID8696199
PMCPMC2351617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.