Trial reportThorax1996
Effect of nebulised recombinant DNase on neutrophil elastase load in cystic fibrosis.
Trial report in Thorax, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase I Studies of Acebilustat: Biomarker Response and Safety in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.Clinical and translational science · 2017Trial
- Targeted DNase treatment of obstructive lung disease: a pilot randomised controlled trial.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Mucus-targeting therapies of defective mucus clearance for cystic fibrosis: A short review.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Targeting airway inflammation in cystic fibrosis in children: past, present, and future.Paediatric drugs · 2011Review
- Proteases and cystic fibrosis.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2008Review
- Article
- The protease-antiprotease battle in the cystic fibrosis lung.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 1999Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA released by degenerating inflammatory neutrophils contributes to mucous plugging of airways in patients with cystic fibrosis. Neutrophil elastase, a major effector of tissue destruction in the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis, is a highly cationic molecule which is bound and inhibited by negatively charged polyanions such as mucin and DNA in purulent sputum. Thus, the solubilisation of DNA in the airways by aerosolised recombinant DNase may remove a source of neutrophil elastase inhibition, effectively increasing elastase load. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of rhDNase therapy on neutrophil elastase load in patients with cystic fibrosis.
methodsBlood and sputum were collected from 15 patients with cystic fibrosis before initiation of nebulised DNase therapy and at 12 weeks following therapy. The long term effects of continuous rhDNase administration were evaluated at 52 weeks for 11 of these patients. Plasma was analysed for neutrophil elastase, interleukin (IL)-8 and neutrophil elastase in complex with alpha 1-protease inhibitor (alpha 1PI). Sputum was assessed for neutrophil elastase, IL-8, and active elastase. At each visit spirometric measurements were carried out.
resultsSputum elastase activity decreased at 12 weeks and was maintained at 52 weeks when a decline in total plasma elastase was also observed. Although, as expected, there was a correlation between plasma levels of total elastase and neutrophil elastase/alpha 1PI complex, the decrease in the levels of the complex at 52 weeks did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsThis study indicates that prolonged daily administration of rhDNase results in a reduction in elastase load in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.