ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1996
Naturally occurring variation in copia expression is due to both element (cis) and host (trans) regulatory variation.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Copia retrotransposon in the Zaprionus genus: another case of transposable element sharing with the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.Journal of molecular evolution · 2011Article
- LTR retrotransposons and the evolution of dosage compensation in Drosophila.BMC molecular biology · 2008Article
- The ribosomal shunt translation strategy of cauliflower mosaic virus has evolved from ancient long terminal repeats.Journal of virology · 2006Article
- Variability, recombination, and mosaic evolution of the barley BARE-1 retrotransposon.Journal of molecular evolution · 2005Article
- High-level gene expression in Aedes albopictus cells using a baculovirus Hr3 enhancer and IE1 transactivator.BMC molecular biology · 2004Article
- Intercellular communication between germ line and somatic line is utilized to control the transcription of ZAM, an endogenous retrovirus from Drosophila melanogaster.Nucleic acids research · 2004Article
- The 5' untranslated region and Gag product of Idefix, a long terminal repeat-retrotransposon from Drosophila melanogaster, act together to initiate a switch between translated and untranslated states of the genomic mRNA.Molecular and cellular biology · 2003Article
- Survey of transcripts in the adult Drosophila brain.Genome biology · 2001Article
- Evidence for the recent horizontal transfer of long terminal repeat retrotransposon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999Article
- Transcriptional activation of the tobacco retrotransposon Tto1 by wounding and methyl jasmonate.Plant molecular biology · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant differences in levels of copia [Drosophila long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon] expression exist among six species representing the Drosophila melanogaster species complex (D. melanogaster, Drosophila mauritiana, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila yakuba, and Drosophila erecta) and a more distantly related species (Drosophila willistoni). These differences in expression are correlated with major size variation mapping to putative regulatory regions of the copia 5' LTR and adjacent untranslated leader region (ULR). Sequence analysis indicates that these size variants were derived from a series of regional duplication events. The ability of the copia LTR-ULR size variants to drive expression of a bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene was tested in each of the seven species. The results indicate that both element-encoded (cis) and host-genome-encoded (trans) genetic differences are responsible for the variability in copia expression within and between Drosophila species. This finding indicates that models purporting to explain the dynamics and distribution of retrotransposons in natural populations must consider the potential impact of both element-encoded and host-genome-encoded regulatory variation to be valid. We propose that interelement selection among retrotransposons may provide a molecular drive mechanism for the evolution of eukaryotic enhancers which can be subsequently distributed throughout the genome by retrotransposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.