Trial reportNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology1996
Effects of different congestion pressures on the diameter of the dorsal hand vein and on its apparent sensitivity to noradrenaline.
Trial report in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have measured the diameter of the human dorsal hand vein (DHV) in situ and compared the venoconstrictor dose-response curves to locally infused noradrenaline at different venous congestion pressures using the DHV compliance technique. Congestion pressure was defined as the inflation pressure of a sphygmomanometer cuff on the ipsilateral upper arm. Male healthy volunteers (20-45 years) participated in two experimental sessions. In Session I, DHV diameter was measured at congestion pressures of 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70 mmHg. In Session II, venoconstrictor dose-response curves to six doses (0.1-33.33 ng min-1) of (-)noradrenaline acid tartrate were established at congestion pressures 30 and 45 mmHg. DHV diameter increased as a function of congestion pressure. The rate of increase in DHV diameter (mm/5 mmHg) declined at higher values of congestion pressure (e.g. 0.14 mm/5 mmHg between 20 and 45 mmHg, and 0.04 mm/5 mmHg between 45 and 70 mmHg). Noradrenaline was less potent at 45 mmHg than at 30 mmHg. Mean log ED50 was significantly greater at 45 mmHg than at 30 mmHg congestion pressure, while mean E(max) did not differ at the two congestion pressures. The geometric mean ED50 was approximately 195% greater at 45 mmHg than at 30 mmHg. These results show that DHV diameter is positively related to congestion pressure, and that as the congestion pressure increases, the apparent sensitivity of the vein to the venoconstrictor effect of noradrenaline decreases. This latter finding is consistent with the physiological antagonism between congestion-induced venodilatation and noradrenaline-evoked venoconstriction. It is recommended that a standard congestion pressure is used in order to facilitate the comparison of results obtained in different laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.