Preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Reproductive options for families at risk of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: a review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020
   Review
2. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2007
   Review
3. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency by simultaneous analysis of duplex-nested PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a case report.Journal of Korean medical science · 2007
   Article
4. Current status of preimplantation diagnosis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 1997
   Article
5. Normal twins born following preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a couple affected by X-linked hydrocephaly.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 1996
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as