Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8688588›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics1996

Reduction in signal overlap results in increased FISH efficiency: implications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

S Munné, T Dailey, M Finkelstein, H U Weier

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pre-implantation genetic testing: Past, present, future.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bioinformatics tools allow targeted selection of chromosome enumeration probes and aneuploidy detection.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2013
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 1996
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S MunnéNew York Hospital-Cornell University Medical Center, New York, USA.
T Dailey
M Finkelstein
H U Weier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the absence of mosaicism, one of the problems of preimplantation genetic diagnosis with FISH is the occurrence of false-negative hybridization results. It has been hypothesized that missing signals are produced by spatial overlap of signals. METHODS AND

resultsTo investigate the relation among cell density, signal overlap, and hybridization signal detection, 371 blastomeres and 4556 lymphocytes were fixed in different cellular concentrations and analyzed by FISH using probes for chromosomes X, Y, and 18, and their nuclear diameters and FISH results scored. The results showed that the lower the diameter of fixed nuclei, the higher the number of signal overlaps and missing signals. The minimum number of missing signals was obtained when lymphocyte and blastomere nuclei had 40 or more microns in diameter after fixation and FISH. Since blastomeres were fixed individually, results with blastomeres were invariably better than with lymphocytes.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAneuploidyBlastomeresCell CountCell NucleusCell SizeChromosome AberrationsChromosome DisordersDNA ProbesFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleFetal DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersHumansDNA ProbesGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID8688588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.