Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8680739›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995

Cellular localization of the inhibitory action of relaxin against uterine spasm.

S J Hughes, M Hollingsworth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S J HughesSmooth Muscle Pharmacology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford.
M Hollingsworth
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The aim of this study was to determine whether the site of action of relaxin as a relaxant of rat myometrium is at the cell membrane or at an intracellular-site. Therefore, the potency of relaxin was determined against spasms reliant predominantly upon either extracellular Ca2+ or intracellular Ca2+. Uterine spasms dependent upon extracellular Ca2+ were elicited by (i) oxytocin (0.2 nM) (ii) Bay K 8644 (1 microM) in 10 mM K(+)-rich PSS and (iii) KCl (80 mM). Uterine spasm dependent upon intracellular Ca2+ was elicited by oxytocin (20 nM) in the presence of nifedipine (500 nM). The effects of relaxin against these spasmogens were compared with those of levcromakalim, nifedipine and salbutamol. 2. Relaxin (0.2-6.3 nM), levcromakalim (25-800 nM), salbutamol (1-63 nM) and nifedipine (1-250 nM) caused concentration-dependent inhibition of the spasm evoked by oxytocin (0.2 nM) and relaxin was the most potent relaxant. 3. Relaxin and nifedipine were slightly less potent against the spasm induced by Bay K 8644 (1 microM) than against spasm induced by oxytocin (0.2 nM) (15 fold and 13 fold respectively). Levcromakalim and salbutamol were equipotent against the spasm evoked by Bay K 8644 (1 microM) and that evoked by oxytocin (0.2 nM). 4. Relaxin induced only 47 +/- 7% inhibition of the KCl (80 mM)-evoked spasm at a concentration of 0.8 microM. Levcromakalim was much less potent (427 fold) against the spasm evoked by KCl (80 mM) than against the spasm evoked by oxytocin (0.2 nM). The potency of salbutamol against the spasm evoked by KCl (80 mM) was modestly reduced (14 fold) compared to that against the spasm evoked by oxytocin (0.2 nM). The potency of nifedipine against the KCl (80 mM)-evoked spasm was not different from that against the oxytocin (0.2 nM)-evoked spasm. 5. The potencies of relaxin and levcromakalim against the spasm evoked by oxytocin (20 nM) + nifedipine (500 nM) were greatly reduced (74 fold and 234 fold respectively) compared to their potencies against the spasm evoked by oxytocin (0.2 nM). The potency of salbutamol against these two spasmogens was not different. 6. Relaxin was much less potent against the spasm dependent upon intracellular Ca2+ (that induced by oxytocin (20 nM) + nifedipine (500 nM)) than against the spasms dependent upon extracellular Ca2+, those induced by oxytocin (0.2 nM) and Bay K 8644 (1 microM). In this regard, relaxin resembled levcromakalim and nifedipine rather than salbutamol. Therefore, the major site of action of relaxin appears to be located at the plasma membrane rather than at an intracellular level. The observation that relaxin was less effective against the KCl (80 mM)-induced spasm than against the oxytocin (0.2 nM)-evoked spasm may indicate that relaxin has a minor action involving K(+)-channel opening. 7. High concentrations of relaxin (up to 1 microM) induced significant inhibition of the spasm dependent upon intracellular Ca2+. Thus at high concentrations relaxin also appears to have an additional intracellular action.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsAlbuterolAnimalsBenzopyransCalciumCalcium Channel AgonistsCalcium Channel BlockersCell MembraneCromakalimFemaleNifedipinePotassium ChannelsPyrrolesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRelaxinAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAlbuterolBenzopyransCalciumCalcium Channel AgonistsCalcium Channel BlockersCromakalimNifedipinePotassium ChannelsPyrrolesRelaxin

Identifiers

PMID8680739
PMCPMC1909230
OpenAlexW2028309077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.