Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8668539›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1996

DNA rehybridization during PCR: the 'Cot effect' and its consequences.

F Mathieu-Daudé, J Welsh, T Vogt, M McClelland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Multi-template polymerase chain reaction.Biomolecular detection and quantification · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F Mathieu-DaudéSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
J Welsh
T Vogt
M McClelland

Funding

RNA FINGERPRINTING USING ARBITRARILY PRIMED PCRR01CA068822 · NCI · VACCINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SAN DIEGO · PI MCCLELLAND, MICHAEL · 1995 to 2008
$2.8M
RNA FINGERPRINTS--DIFFERENTIAL GENE EXPRESSION IN BRAINR01NS033377 · NINDS · SIDNEY KIMMEL CANCER CENTER · PI MCCLELLAND, MICHAEL · 1994 to 1996
–
POPULATION BIOLOGY OF BORRELIA BURGDORFERIR29AI032644 · NIAID · SIDNEY KIMMEL CANCER CENTER · PI WELSH, JOHN T · 1993 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS CA 68822NIAID NIH HHS AI32644NINDS NIH HHS NS33377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rate of amplification of abundant PCR products generally declines faster than that of less abundant products in the same tube in the later cycles of PCR. As a consequence, differences in product abundance diminish as the number of PCR cycles increases. Rehybridization of PCR products which may interfere with primer binding or extension can explain this significant feature in late cycles. Rehybridization occurs with a half-time dependent on the reciprocal of the DNA concentration. Thus, if multiple PCR products are amplified in the same tube, reannealing occurs faster for the more abundant PCR products. In RT-PCR using an internal control, this results in a systematic bias against the more abundant of the two PCR products. In RNA fingerprinting by arbitrarily primed PCR (or differentially display of cDNAs), very large or absolute differences in the expression of a transcript between samples are preserved but smaller real differences may be gradually erased as the PCR reaction proceeds. Thus, this 'Cot effect' may systematically cause an underestimate of the true difference in starting template concentrations. However, differences in starting template concentrations will be better preserved in the less abundant PCR products. Furthermore, the slow down in amplification of abundant products will allow these rarer products to become more visible in the fingerprint which may, in turn, allow rarer cDNAs to be sampled more efficiently. In some applications, where the object is to stochiometrically amplify a mixture of nucleic acids, the bias against abundant PCR products can be partly overcome by limiting the number of PCR cycles and, thus, the concentration of the products. In other cases, abundance normalization at later cycles may be useful, such as in the production of normalized libraries.

Indexed as

DNANucleic Acid HybridizationPolymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsBase SequenceFalse Negative ReactionsMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, Single-Stranded ConformationalRNA, ProtozoanTrypanosoma brucei bruceiDNARNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID8668539
PMCPMC145907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.