Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8668182›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1996

Non-Mendelian, heritable blocks to DNA rearrangement are induced by loading the somatic nucleus of Tetrahymena thermophila with germ line-limited DNA.

D L Chalker, M C Yao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. An expanding world of small RNAs.Developmental cell · 2014
    Article
  12. Epigenetics of ciliates.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

D L ChalkerDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA. dchalker@fred.fhcrc.org
M C Yao
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZA

Funding

GENE AMPLIFICATION AND ELIMINATION IN TETRAHYMENAR01GM026210 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YAO, MENG-CHAO H · 1985 to 2006
$4.0M
DEVELOPMENTALLY PROGRAMMED DNA DELETION IN TETRAHYMENAF32GM016315 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI CHALKER, DOUGLAS LEE · 1993 to 1995
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM16315NIGMS NIH HHS GM26210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Site-specific DNA deletion occurs at thousands of sites within the genome during macronuclear development of Tetrahymena thermophila. These deletion elements are usually not detected in macronuclear chromosomes. We have interfered with the normal deletion of two of these elements, the adjacent M and R elements, by loading vegetative macronuclei with these elements prior to sexual conjugation. Transformed cell lines containing the exogenous M or R element, carried on high-copy-number vectors containing genes encoding rRNA within parental (old) macronuclei, consistently failed to excise chromosomal copies of the M or R element during formation of new macronuclei. Little or no interference with the deletions of adjacent elements or of unlinked elements was observed. The micronucleus (germ line)-limited region of each element was sufficient to inhibit specific DNA deletion. This interference with DNA deletion usually is manifested as a cytoplasmic dominant trait: deletion elements present in the old macronucleus of one partner of a mating pair were sufficient to inhibit deletion occurring in the other partner. Remarkably, the failure to excise these elements became a non-Mendelian, inheritable trait in the next generation and did not require the high copy number of exogenously introduced elements. The introduction of exogenous deletion elements into parental macronuclei provides us with an epigenetic means to establish a heritable pattern of DNA rearrangement.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCell NucleusCrosses, GeneticDNA PrimersDNA, ProtozoanMicronucleus, GermlineModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPlasmidsPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence DeletionTetrahymena thermophilaTransformation, GeneticDNA PrimersDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID8668182
PMCPMC231361
OpenAlexW2145264494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.