ArticleThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume1996
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.
Article in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 467 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Dislocation Precautions on Fear and Function in Patients Undergoing Hip Replacement
Nexus Evaluation Primary Trident II UNcemented shEll (NEPTUNE): A Longitudinal Cohort Study of the Hydroxyapatite Coated Trident II Acetabular System in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Who cites it
467 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating methodological quality of prognostic prediction models on patient-reported outcome measurements after total hip and total knee arthroplasty : a systematic review.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
- What patient reported outcome measures are used in clinical trials in hip fracture? A systematic mapping review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Pain, function and quality of life are impaired in adults undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for hip dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2024Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of direct superior approach (DSA) for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Manual therapy and exercise for adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2023Pooled it
- The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in rapidly progressive osteoarthritis: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Pooled it
- The impact of surgical trainee involvement in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of surgical efficacy, patient safety, and outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Pooled it
- Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Rehabilitation protocols in unstable trochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails in elderly: current practices and outcome.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes of the hip shelf arthroplasty in adolescents and adults with residual hip dysplasia: a systematic review.Acta orthopaedica · 2020Pooled it
- Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Health effects of a low-inflammatory diet in adults with arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nutritional science · 2020Pooled it
- Hybrid versus cemented implants for total hip replacement: a randomised feasibility study with embedded qualitative research.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Trial
- Consequences of Delaying Surgical Intervention in Patients With Native Joint Septic Arthritis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Clinical and cost effectiveness of single stage compared with two stage revision for hip prosthetic joint infection (INFORM): pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Trial
- Assessing a 12-month course of oral alendronate for adults with avascular necrosis of the hip: MANTIS RCT with internal pilot.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022Trial
- Exploring the prevalence and impact of hip and knee pain in pulmonary rehabilitation: a propensity-matched cohort study.Respiratory research · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of Same-day Discharge Surgery for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Trial
407 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed a 12-item questionnaire for completion by patients having total hip replacement (THR). A prospective study of 220 patients was undertaken before operation and at follow-up six months later. Each completed the new questionnaire as well as the SF36, and some the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). An orthopaedic surgeon assessed the Charnley hip score. The single score derived from the questionnaire had a high internal consistency. Reproducibility was examined by test-retest reliability and was found to be satisfactory. The validity of the questionnaire was established by obtaining significant correlation in the expected direction with the Charnley scores and relevant scales of the SF36 and the AIMS. Sensitivity to change was assessed by analysing the differences between the preoperative scores and those at the follow-up. The standardised effect size for the new questionnaire compared favourably with that for the SF36 and the AIMS. The new questionnaire provides a measure of outcome for THR which is short, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8666621What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.