ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996
Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 245 papers, 24 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hetastarch (Hextend) and Bleeding Complications After Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery
Quality of Life and Achievement of Target of Treatment After Optimized Medical Treatment, Physical Training and Smoking Cessation With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris.
Clear Liquid vs Liberalized Diet in Preparation for Colonoscopy
Analgesic and Hemodynamic Effects of Continuous Epidural Analgesia Compared to Paravertebral Block in Liver Resection Patients
Temporal Differences in Pain, Muscle Stiffness, and Function in Subjects With Plantar Fasciitis After Myofascial Release Therapy
Who cites it
245 citing papers in PubMed, 24 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Shorter Versus Longer Antibiotic Treatment in Children With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Pooled it
- Shorter versus longer antibiotic therapy for children with acute otitis media: A systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Pooled it
- Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Sodium valproate versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Phenytoin versus valproate monotherapy for partial onset seizures and generalised onset tonic-clonic seizures: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Using noninferiority tests to evaluate telemedicine and e-health services: systematic review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2012Pooled it
- Pentoxifylline for diabetic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Treatments for symptomatic urinary tract infections during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Effectiveness of protease inhibitor monotherapy versus combination antiretroviral maintenance therapy: a meta-analysis.PloS one · 2011Pooled it
- Room for improvement in conducting and reporting non-inferiority randomized controlled trials on drugs: a systematic review.PloS one · 2010Pooled it
- Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine in treating severe malaria in children: a systematic review.Malaria journal · 2008Pooled it
- Systemic corticosteroids for acute gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
185 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byPlacebo mania.1996
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of an equivalence trial is to show the therapeutic equivalence of two treatments, usually a new drug under development and an existing drug for the same disease used as a standard active comparator. Unfortunately the principles that govern the design, conduct, and analysis of equivalence trials are not as well understood as they should be. Consequently such trials often include too few patients or have intrinsic design biases which tend towards the conclusion of no difference. In addition the application of hypothesis testing in analysing and interpreting data from such trials sometimes compounds the drawing of inappropriate conclusions, and the inclusion and exclusion of patients from analysis may be poorly managed. The design of equivalence trials should mirror that of earlier successful trials of the active comparator as closely as possible. Patient losses and other deviations from the protocol should be minimised; analysis strategies to deal with unavoidable problems should not centre on an "intention to treat" analysis but should seek to show the similarity of results from a range of approaches. Analysis should be based on confidence intervals, and this also carries implications for the estimation of the required numbers of patients at the design stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.