ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996
Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Should women aged 70-74 be invited to participate in screening mammography? A report on two Australian community juries.BMJ open · 2018Trial
- Polarity in healthcare priority setting: a comparative analysis of attitudes among Finnish physicians, dentists, MPs, and citizens.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Citizens from 13 countries share similar preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocation priorities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Public perspectives on acquired brain injury rehabilitation and components of care: A Citizens' Jury.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Assessing the public acceptability of proposed policy interventions to reduce the misuse of antibiotics in Australia: A report on two community juries.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
- CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017Article
- Article
- What is the evidence base for public involvement in health-care policy?: results of a systematic scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
- Evaluating the use of citizens' juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation.BMC public health · 2013Article
- Exploring public perspectives on e-health: findings from two citizen juries.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011Article
- Claims on health care: a decision-making framework for equity, with application to treatment for HIV/AIDS in South Africa.Health policy and planning · 2011Article
- A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research.Clinical and translational science · 2011Article
- Reorienting programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) towards disinvestment.BMC health services research · 2010Review
- Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2008Article
- Combining evidence and values in priority setting: testing the balance sheet method in a low-income country.BMC health services research · 2007Article
- Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2003Review
- On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research.The Milbank quarterly · 2003Review
- Choices without reasons: citizens' juries and policy evaluation.Journal of medical ethics · 2000Article
- Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Citizens' juries are an attempt to meaningfully involve members of the public in decisions which affect them in their own communities. The Institute for Public Policy Research and Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority have recently piloted the first jury in the United Kingdom. Sixteen jurors sat for four days, hearing evidence from a number of expert witnesses. The jurors were asked to consider how priorities for health care should be set, according to what criteria, and to what extent the public should be involved in this process. This pilot was also an attempt to assess the process itself, and our initial evaluation indicates that, given enough time and information, the public is willing and able to contribute to the debate about priority setting in health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.