Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8664671›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996

Media coverage of the Child B case.

V A Entwistle, I S Watt, R Bradbury, L J Pehl

Open access · greenAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002
    Pooled it
  2. Demands for 'off-licence' access to trastuzumab (Herceptin): content analysis of UK newspaper articles.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Article
  3. Survivors on Cancer: the portrayal of survivors in print news.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2007
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Confidentiality and the ethics of medical ethics.Journal of medical ethics · 2003
    Article
  6. Public involvement in health care priority setting: an economic perspective.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 1999
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cochrane Lecture 1997. What evidence do we need for evidence based medicine?Journal of epidemiology and community health · 1997
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Rationing health care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996
    Article
  12. Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

V A EntwistleNHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. vael@york.ac.uk
I S Watt
R Bradbury
L J Pehl
University of York · GBKleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) · GBYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The case of a girl with leukaemia, known as Child B, hit the headlines in March 1995 when her father refused to accept the advice of doctors who counselled against further treatment and took Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority to court for refusing to fund chemotherapy and a second bone transplant for her in the private sector. British national newspapers varied greatly in the way they covered the case. Some paid little attention to clinical considerations and presented the case as an example of rationing based on financial considerations. Their selective presentations meant that anyone reading just one newspaper would have received only limited and partial information. If members of the public are to participate in debates about treatment decisions and health care rationing, means other than the media will need to be found to inform and involve them.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthEditorial PoliciesHealth Care RationingInformation DisseminationNewspapers as TopicPublic RelationsResource AllocationTherapies, InvestigationalChildDecision MakingDissent and DisputesEnglandFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansMedical FutilityHealth Care and Public HealthNational Health ServiceR. v. Cambridge Health Authority

Identifiers

PMID8664671
PMCPMC2351312
OpenAlexW2091841067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.