Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8664665›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996

Teenagers' knowledge of emergency contraception: questionnaire survey in south east Scotland.

A Graham, L Green, A F Glasier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Emergency contraception].Atencion primaria · 2001
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Teenage health and the practice nurse: choice and opportunity for both?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
  13. Preventing teenage pregnancy.Archives of disease in childhood · 1997
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A GrahamEdinburgh Healthcare NHS Trust Family Planning and Well Woman Services.
L Green
A F Glasier
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBThe Family Centre · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the level of knowledge of emergency contraception among 14 and 15 year olds.

designConfidential questionnaire survey.

setting10 secondary schools in Lothian, south east Scotland. SUBJECTS: 1206 pupils predominantly (98.7%) aged 14 and 15 in the fourth year of secondary school.

main outcome measuresKnowledge of the existence of emergency contraception; of its safety, efficacy, and time limits; and of where to obtain it.

results1121 (93.0%) fourth year pupils aged 14-16 had heard of emergency contraception. 194 girls (32.7%) and 168 boys (27.5%) had experienced sexual intercourse. Of girls who had experienced sexual intercourse, 61 (31.4%) had used emergency contraception. Knowledge of correct time limits was poor, sexually active girls being the most knowledgeable. Pupils attending schools ranked lower than the national average for academic attainment were less likely to have heard of emergency contraception and more likely to have been sexually active. 861 (76.8%) pupils knew they could obtain emergency contraception from their doctor. 925 (82.5%) pupils believed emergency contraception to be effective but 398 (35.5%) thought it more dangerous than the oral contraceptive pill.

conclusionsOne third of sexually active girls aged under 16 in Lothian have used emergency contraception. This may help explain the fairly constant teenage pregnancy rates despite increasing sexual activity. Scottish teenagers are well informed about the existence of emergency contraception. However, many do not know when and how to access it properly. Health education initiatives should target teenagers from less academic schools as they are more likely to be sexually active at a young age and are less well informed about emergency contraception.

Indexed as

ContraceptionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentContraceptives, PostcoitalFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleScotlandSex EducationSex FactorsSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesContraceptives, PostcoitalAdolescentsAge FactorsContraceptionContraceptive AgentsContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Agents, PostcoitalDemographic FactorsDeveloped CountriesEuropeFamily PlanningFertility Control, PostcoitalKnowledgeNorthern EuropePopulationPopulation CharacteristicsResearch ReportScotlandUnited KingdomYouth

Identifiers

PMID8664665
PMCPMC2351287
OpenAlexW2061850171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.