Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8664155›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine1995

Validation of the STR system FES/FPS for forensic purposes in an Austrian population sample.

M Klintschar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of new primers for CSF1PO.International journal of legal medicine · 1997
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M KlintscharInstitut für Gerichtliche Medizin, University of Graz, Austria.
University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The short tandem repeat system FES/FPS was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 211 unrelated Austrians and analysed by horizontal, non-denaturing electrophoresis. The allele distribution was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. No mutations were found in 25 families (50 meioses). The mean exclusion chance was 0.49, the discriminating power 0.86 and the heterozygosity rate 74.4%. Amplification could be achieved with as little as 100 pg of high molecular weight DNA, which could be reduced to 75 pg by using 32 instead of 30 cycles. By reamplifying 1 microliter for another 15 cycles, the threshold could be reduced to less than 20 pg. In a degradation experiment DNA extracted from bloodstains stored for up to 24 days in a moist chamber and DNA boiled for up to 18 min could be amplified.

Indexed as

AustriaBlood StainsDNA FingerprintingGene FrequencyHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthProto-Oncogene ProteinsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityProto-Oncogene Proteins

Identifiers

PMID8664155
OpenAlexW2016760994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.