Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8662246›Full record

ArticleChromosoma1996

Region-specific YAC banding and painting probes for comparative genome mapping: implications for the evolution of human chromosome 2.

T Haaf, P Bray-Ward

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular cytogenetic dissection of human chromosomes 3 and 21 evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
  3. Comparative FISH mapping of the ancestral fusion point of human chromosome 2.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2000
    Article
  4. Article
  5. IRS-PCR-based genetic mapping of the huntingtin interacting protein gene (HIP1) on mouse chromosome 5.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1998
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T HaafMax Planck Institute of Molecular Genetics, Ihnestrasse 73, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.
P Bray-Ward
Max Planck Society · DEYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, several hundred nonchimeric yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) from the Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain containing polymorphic sequence-tagged sites have been mapped by fluoresence in situ hybridization (FISH) on human metaphase chromosomes. Because they carry an average of 1 Mb of human genomic DNA, CEPH YACs generate high-intensity in situ hybridization signals. The available set of cytogenetically and genetically anchored YACs, approximately one every 5-10 cM evenly spaced over almost the entire human genome, provides complex region-specific probes for molecular cytogenetics. YAC probes can be adapted with unlimited flexibility to specific FISH applications such as the study of chromosomal evolution. We have generated representational probes for YAC banding and painting of human chromosome 2 and its great ape homologs. Convergent inversions were found in the pericentric region of the gorilla and orangutan homologs of chromosome 2p.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChromosomes, Artificial, YeastChromosomes, Human, Pair 2AnimalsBase SequenceChromosome BandingChromosome MappingDatabases, FactualGorilla gorillaHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMolecular Sequence DataPan troglodytesPongo pygmaeus

Identifiers

PMID8662246
OpenAlexW2075304704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.