ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1996
Polymorphism and concerted evolution in a tandemly repeated gene family: 5S ribosomal DNA in diploid and allopolyploid cottons.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 223 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unambiguous chromosome identification by multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridisation reveals the genome organisation and evolution of sheepgrass (Leymus chinensis).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Diverging repeatomes in holoparasitic Hydnoraceae uncover a playground of genome evolution.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Analysis of 5S rDNA Genomic Organization Through the RepeatExplorer2 Pipeline: A Simplified Protocol.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- A Multigene Phylogeny of Native American Hawkweeds (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Tracing the Evolution of the Angiosperm Genome from the Cytogenetic Point of View.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- 5S Ribosomal DNA of GenusFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- The Ribosomal DNA Loci of the Ancient MonocotFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Neofunctionalization of a polyploidization-activated cotton long intergenic non-coding RNA DAN1 during drought stress regulation.Plant physiology · 2021Article
- Molecular Evolution and Organization of Ribosomal DNA in the Hawkweed Tribe Hieraciinae (Cichorieae, Asteraceae).Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Mosaic Arrangement of the 5S rDNA in the Aquatic PlantFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Horizontally Acquired nrDNAs Persist in Low Amounts in HostFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Ancient Origin of Two 5S rDNA Families Dominating in the GenusFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- The Utility of Graph Clustering of 5S Ribosomal DNA Homoeologs in Plant Allopolyploids, Homoploid Hybrids, and Cryptic Introgressants.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Low coverage sequencing for repetitive DNA analysis in Passiflora edulis Sims: citogenomic characterization of transposable elements and satellite DNA.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Insights into the Evolution of the New World Diploid Cottons (Gossypium, Subgenus Houzingenia) Based on Genome Sequencing.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- FISH-aimed karyotype analysis in Aconitum subgen. Aconitum reveals excessive rDNA sites in tetraploid taxa.Protoplasma · 2018Article
- Variations in 5S rDNAs in diploid and tetraploid offspring of red crucian carp × common carp.BMC genetics · 2017Article
- High and uneven levels of 45S rDNA site-number variation across wild populations of a diploid plant genus (Anacyclus, Asteraceae).PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- Conserved Organisation of 45S rDNA Sites and rDNA Gene Copy Number among Major Clades of Early Land Plants.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
5S RNA genes and their nontranscribed spacers are tandemly repeated in plant genomes at one or more chromosomal loci. To facilitate an understanding of the forces that govern 5S rDNA evolution, copy-number estimation and DNA sequencing were conducted for a phylogenetically well-characterized set of 16 diploid species of cotton (Gossypium) and 4 species representing allopolyploid derivatives of the diploids. Copy number varies over twentyfold in the genus, from approximately 1,000 to 20,000 copies/2C genome. When superimposed on the organismal phylogeny, these data reveal examples of both array expansion and contraction. Across species, a mean of 12% of nucleotide positions are polymorphic within individual arrays, for both gene and spacer sequences. This shows, in conjunction with phylogenetic evidence for ancestral polymorphisms that survive speciation events, that intralocus concerted evolutionary forces are relatively weak and that the rate of interrepeat homogenization is approximately equal to the rate of speciation. Evidence presented also shows that duplicated 5S rDNA arrays in allopolyploids have retained their subgenomic identity since polyploid formation, thereby indicating that interlocus concerted evolution has not been an important factor in the evolution of these arrays. A descriptive model, one which incorporates the opposing forces of mutation and homogenization within a selective framework, is outlined to account for the empirical data presented. Weak homogenizing forces allow equivalent levels of sequence polymorphism to accumulate in the 5S gene and spacer sequences, but fixation of mutations is nearly prohibited in the 5S gene. As a consequence, fixed interspecific differences are statistically underrepresented for 5S genes. This result explains the apparent paradox that despite similar levels of gene and spacer diversity, phylogenetic analysis of spacer sequences yields highly resolved trees, whereas analyses based on 5S gene sequences do not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.