Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8661994›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1996

Ferritin gene organization: differences between plants and animals suggest possible kingdom-specific selective constraints.

D Proudhon, J Wei, J Briat, E C Theil

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Regulation of Iron Homeostasis and Use in Chloroplasts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Iron-based redox switches in biology.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2009
    Review
  7. Iron stress in plants.Genome biology · 2002
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D ProudhonDepartment of Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, NCSU Box 7622, Raleigh, NC 27695-7622, USA.
J Wei
J Briat
E C Theil
North Carolina State University · USÉcole nationale supérieure d'arts et métiers · FR

Funding

RED CELL FERRITIN: ONTOGENETIC CONTROLR01DK020251 · NIDDK · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GOSS, DIXIE J, THEIL, ELIZABETH C · 1986 to 2010
$5.1M
Ferritin: Protein/mRNA/DNA in Fe/O Regulation/MetabolismR56DK020251 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RES CTR AT OAKLAND · PI GOSS, DIXIE J, THEIL, ELIZABETH C · 2008 to 2008
$120k
RED CELL FERRITIN MRNA AND PROTEIN-STRUCTURE/FUNCTIONR37DK020251 · NIDDK · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI THEIL, ELIZABETH C · 1987 to 1994
–
NIDDK NIH HHS DK-20251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ferritin, a protein widespread in nature, concentrates iron approximately 10(11)-10(12)-fold above the solubility within a spherical shell of 24 subunits; it derives in plants and animals from a common ancestor (based on sequence) but displays a cytoplasmic location in animals compared to the plastid in contemporary plants. Ferritin gene regulation in plants and animals is altered by development, hormones, and excess iron; iron signals target DNA in plants but mRNA in animals. Evolution has thus conserved the two end points of ferritin gene expression, the physiological signals and the protein structure, while allowing some divergence of the genetic mechanisms. Comparison of ferritin gene organization in plants and animals, made possible by the cloning of a dicot (soybean) ferritin gene presented here and the recent cloning of two monocot (maize) ferritin genes, shows evolutionary divergence in ferritin gene organization between plants and animals but conservation among plants or among animals; divergence in the genetic mechanism for iron regulation is reflected by the absence in all three plant genes of the IRE, a highly conserved, noncoding sequence in vertebrate animal ferritin mRNA. In plant ferritin genes, the number of introns (n = 7) is higher than in animals (n = 3). Second, no intron positions are conserved when ferritin genes of plants and animals are compared, although all ferritin gene introns are in the coding region; within kingdoms, the intron positions in ferritin genes are conserved. Finally, secondary protein structure has no apparent relationship to intron/exon boundaries in plant ferritin genes, whereas in animal ferritin genes the correspondence is high. The structural differences in introns/exons among phylogenetically related ferritin coding sequences and the high conservation of the gene structure within plant or animal kingdoms of the gene structure within plant or animal kingdoms suggest that kingdom-specific functional constraints may exist to maintain a particular intron/exon pattern within ferritin genes. In the case of plants, where ferritin gene intron placement is unrelated to triplet codons or protein structure, and where ferritin is targeted to the plastid, the selection pressure on gene organization may relate to RNA function and plastid/nuclear signaling.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceCloning, MolecularExonsFerritinsGenesGenes, PlantGlycine maxHumansIntronsMolecular Sequence DataRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNAFerritins

Identifiers

PMID8661994
OpenAlexW2016337968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.