Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8661693›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society1996

Construction of a cytogenetically characterized porcine somatic cell hybrid panel and its use as a mapping tool.

C Zijlstra, A A Bosma, N A de Haan, C Mellink

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The cytogenetic map of the domestic pig.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1997
    Article
  2. Mapping of microsatellite markers developed from a flow-sorted swine chromosome 6 library.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C ZijlstraDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.157, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A A Bosma
N A de Haan
C Mellink
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new panel of cytogenetically characterized pig-rodent somatic cell hybrids was constructed and tested for twelve microsatellite markers with PCR. Cytogenetic characterization of hybrids was accomplished by fluorescence painting and GTG-banding of metaphase chromosomes. The panel consists of 15 independent pig-hamster and 6 independent pig-mouse cell lines. In the panel, all pig autosomes and the X Chromosome (Chr) are represented, and it is informative for all chromosome pairs except 2-14, 2-15, 3-9, 14-15, 14-16, and 16-17. The microsatellites tested were S0022, S0023, S0084, S0098, S0112, S0113, S0114, S0115, S0117, S0118, S0119, and S0120. The PCR results obtained in the 21 hybrids were compared with the cytogenetic data and analyzed for concordancy and correlation. Eight microsatellites could be assigned to specific pig chromosomes, confirming seven assignments based on linkage analysis.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome MappingCricetinaeCytogeneticsGenetic LinkageHybrid CellsMiceMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymerase Chain ReactionSwine

Identifiers

PMID8661693
OpenAlexW2000071328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.