Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8655565›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology1996

Heat shock activation of the groESL operon of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the regulatory roles of the inverted repeat.

G Segal, E Z Ron

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G SegalDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
E Z Ron
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deletions were constructed in the conserved inverted repeat (IR) found in the groESL operon of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and in many other groE and dnaK operons and genes in eubacteria. These deletions affected the level of expression of the operon and the magnitude of its heat shock activation. The IR seems to operate at the DNA level, probably as an operator site that binds a repressor under non-heat shock conditions. The IR was also found to function at the mRNA level, since under non-heat shock conditions transcripts containing deletions of one side of the IR had longer half-lives than did transcripts containing the wild-type IR. Under heat shock conditions, the half-life of the mRNA was unaffected by this deletion because of heat shock-dependent cleavage. However, the groESL operon was found to be heat shock activated even after most of the IR was deleted. This observation, together with the fact that the groESL operon of A. tumefaciens was heat shock activated in Escherichia coli and vice versa, suggests that a heat shock promoter regulates the heat shock activation of this operon. The primary role of the IR appears to be in reducing the MRNA levels from this promoter under non-heat shock conditions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialOperonAgrobacterium tumefaciensBase SequenceChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Consensus SequenceDNA PrimersEscherichia coliGenes, BacterialHot TemperatureMolecular Sequence DataPromoter Regions, GeneticRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA, BacterialRNA, MessengerChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60DNA PrimersRNA, BacterialRNA, MessengerSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID8655565
PMCPMC178137
OpenAlexW2124403740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.