Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8655132›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics1996

Tetrasomy 18p de novo: identification by FISH with conventional and microdissection probes and analysis of parental origin and formation by short sequence repeat typing.

T Eggermann, H Engels, B Moskalonek, M M Nöthen, J Müller-Navia, E Schleiermacher, G Schwanitz, S Stengel-Rutkowski

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prenatal Diagnosis of Mosaic Tetrasomy 18p in a Case without Sonographic Abnormalities.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T EggermannInstitut für Humangenetik, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Germany.
H Engels
B Moskalonek
M M Nöthen
J Müller-Navia
E Schleiermacher
G Schwanitz
S Stengel-Rutkowski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a de novo supernumerary isochromosome 18p in a child with tetrasomy 18p, analyzed by a straightforward combination of cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic methods. The diagnostic procedure consisted of standard banding techniques and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with centromere and library DNA probes for chromosome 18, and 18p-specific FISH probes prepared by chromosome dissesction and in vitro amplification. The maternal origin as well as the most probable cell stages of formation of the supernumerary isochromosome were determined by typing of short sequence repeats (SSRs). The pattern of allelic distribution suggests a nondisjunction during meiosis followed by a centromeric misdivision in an early postzygotic mitosis as the most probable mode of isochromosome 18p formation. The combination of the applied methods represents a powerful tool to investigate the nature and the origin of de novo marker chromosomes.

Indexed as

AneuploidyChromosomes, Human, Pair 18Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAllelesCentromereChild, PreschoolChromosome MappingDNA ProbesFathersFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansInfantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMothersDNA ProbesGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID8655132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.