Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8651513›Full record

ArticleAnatomy and embryology1995

Critical period in muscle spindle regeneration in grafts of developing rat muscles.

I Jirmanová, T Soukup

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomy and embryology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I JirmanováInstitute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
T Soukup
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles from rats at various intervals after birth were grafted into EDL muscles of adult recipients. Three to twelve months after the operation, host muscles containing the grafts were removed and examined for the presence of muscle spindles in the graft. The aim of the study was to establish when muscle spindles become capable of regeneration during development. Regenerated muscles grafted during the first week after birth were virtually spindleless. Grafts of muscles transplanted 10 and 15 days postnatally contained only 5-8 muscle spindles on average. In contrast, the regenerated grafts originating from muscles of 24- and 28-day-old rats were spindle-rich as in mature muscle grafts; the number of spindles in the transplanted EDL muscles (25.0 +/- 2.3; mean +/- SE) attained values comparable to free standard autografts of these muscles in adult animals. Thus, the critical period after grafting, which also involves the loss of a vascular supply, is considerably longer than the critical period for muscle-spindle survival after nerve injury. Fifteen days after birth, when muscle spindles still survive denervation, only a few regenerated spindles were present in the individual muscle regenerates. We assume that the low resistance of immature spindle capsules to ischaemia accounts for their massive degeneration and abortive spindle regeneration in grafts from 10- to 15-day-old rats.

Indexed as

Muscle DevelopmentAdenosine TriphosphatasesAnimalsMuscle, SkeletalMuscle SpindlesMyofibrilsRatsRegenerationAdenosine Triphosphatases

Identifiers

PMID8651513
OpenAlexW2129698872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.