ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996
Comparative effects of PACAP and VIP on pancreatic endocrine secretions and vascular resistance in rat.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protective Effects of PACAP in Diabetic Complications: Retinopathy, Nephropathy and Neuropathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Recombinant Hydrophobic Polypeptide MBAY Loaded Into SPION-Exosome Realizes Sustained-Release to Improve Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Therapeutic potential of vasoactive intestinal peptide and its receptor VPAC2 in type 2 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide (PACAP) in Physiological and Pathological Processes within the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Pancreas-Brain Crosstalk.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021Article
- HIV-based lentivirus-mediated vasoactive intestinal peptide gene delivery protects against DIO animal model of Type 2 diabetes.Gene therapy · 2018Article
- Chitosan-decorated selenium nanoparticles as protein carriers to improve the in vivo half-life of the peptide therapeutic BAY 55-9837 for type 2 diabetes mellitus.International journal of nanomedicine · 2014Article
- Stapled Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) Derivatives Improve VPAC2 Agonism and Glucose-Dependent Insulin Secretion.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2013Article
- Secretin and pancreatic islet blood flow in anesthetized rats: increased insulin secretion with no augmentation of blood perfusion.World journal of surgery · 2001Article
- PAC1 receptor-deficient mice display impaired insulinotropic response to glucose and reduced glucose tolerance.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The effects of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and secretin on pancreatic endocrine secretions and vascular resistance were investigated and compared in the isolated perfused pancreas of the rat. The PACAP/VIP receptor types involved have been characterized. 2. On insulin secretion, in the range 10(-11) to 10(-8) M, PACAP and VIP elicited a concentration-dependent biphasic response from pancreas perfused with 8.3 mM glucose; the peptides were equipotent. In contrast, secretin was ineffective in the range 10(-11) to 10(-9) M; at 10(-8) and 10(-7) M, it induced only low and transient insulin responses. On the other hand, the peptides did not modify the basal insulin release in the presence of a non stimulating glucose concentration (2.8 mM). 3. On glucagon secretion, PACAP and VIP (10(-11) to 10(-8) M) but also secretin (10(-9) to 10(-7) M) caused a concentration-dependent peak shaped response from pancreas perfused with 2.8 mM glucose; PACAP and VIP were equipotent and 20 times more potent then secretin. On the other hand, the peptides did not affect the glucagon release in the presence of 8.3 mM glucose. 4. On pancreatic vessels, in the range 10(-11) to 10(-9) M, the three peptides were equipotent in inducing a concentration-dependent sustained increase in pancreatic flow rate. On the other hand, at the high concentration of 10(-7) M PACAP but not VIP provoked a transient decrease of flow rate. 5. This study provides evidence for PACAP/VIP type II receptors mediating insulin and glucagon secretion as well as vasodilatation in rat pancreas. In addition, the different efficacies of secretin suggest that these effects are mediated by different PACAP/VIP type II receptor subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.