ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996
The Asbury draft policy on ethical use of resources.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Absent virtues: the poacher becomes gamekeeper.Journal of medical ethics · 2003Article
- Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2003Review
- Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Review
- Review
- Ethical conflicts in home care. Patient autonomy and physician advocacy.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 1997Article
- Drug rationing in the UK National Health Service. Current status and future prospects.PharmacoEconomics · 1997Review
- Fundholding practice's draft policy on ethical use of resources. Policy is mechanism by which decisions might be reached.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Article
- Fundholding practice's draft policy on ethical use of resources. Policy is inconsistent.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Article
- Rationing health care. Patients have strong input into purchasing decisions in Droitwich.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Article
- Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Article
- The Asbury draft policy on ethical use of resources.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The general practice partners invited two medical ethicists (RC and TH) to meet them to develop the document. The partners met RC and TH for one and a half hours on eight occasions over one year and met without them on eight further occasions. The entire general practice also had an all day session to discuss in detail an advanced version of the draft. The developmental process was of great value to the partnership and has led to appreciable change in individuals' views. The draft policy presented here is intended to start the ball rolling, so that proper guidelines will be developed at whatever level in the NHS is most appropriate. Comments and feedback are welcomed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.