Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8646146›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996

Collecting morbidity data in general practice: the Somerset morbidity project.

N Pearson, J O'Brien, H Thomas, P Ewings, L Gallier, A Bussey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. What are the most common conditions in primary care? Systematic review.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The feasibility of standardized data collection in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
  16. Shifting the work.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N PearsonSomerset Health Authority, Taunton.
J O'Brien
H Thomas
P Ewings
L Gallier
A Bussey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo collect a valid, complete, continuous, and representative database of morbidity presenting to primary care and to use the data to help commission services on the basis of local need and effectiveness.

settingComputerised general practices in Somerset.

methodsParticipating general practices were selected to be representative of the district health authority population for general practice and population characteristics. All conditions presented at face to face consultations were assigned a Read code and episode type and the data were regularly validated. Data were sent by modem from the practices via a third party to the health authority each week.

main outcome measuresProportion of consultations coded and accuracy of coding.

results11 practices agreed to participate. Validations for completeness during April 1994 to March 1995 revealed that 96.4% of the records were coded; 94% of the 1090 records validated had appropriate episode types and 87% appropriate Read codes. The results have been used to help formulate the health authority's purchasing plans and have enabled a change in the local contracts for surgery for glue ear.

conclusionsThe project has shown the feasibility of establishing a network of practices recording and reporting the morbidity seen in primary care. Early indications are that the data can be useful in evidence based purchasing.

Indexed as

MorbidityAdolescentAdultAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolData CollectionEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleHumansHypertensionIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID8646146
PMCPMC2351269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.