ArticleThe American journal of pathology1996
Chemiluminescent in situ hybridization for the detection of cytomegalovirus DNA.
Article in The American journal of pathology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamics of hepatitis C virus replication in human liver.The American journal of pathology · 2003Article
- New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2000Review
- Prenatal diagnosis of parvovirus B19-induced hydrops fetalis by chemiluminescence in situ hybridization.Journal of clinical microbiology · 1999Article
- Validation of an automated chromogenic in situ hybridization protocol for detection of cytomegalovirus in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded renal graft biopsies.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A chemiluminescent in situ hybridization assay that could combine the sensitivity of chemiluminescent substrates, the specificity of digoxigenin-labeled probes, and the spatial morphological resolution and localization of the signal of the in situ hybridization was developed for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA. CMV DNA in cultured CMV-infected cells and in different clinical samples (tissue sections and cellular smears) was detected using digoxigenin-labeled probes constructed in our laboratory that were immunoenzymatically visualized employing anti-digoxigenin Fab fragments labeled with alkaline phosphatase and the chemiluminescent adamantil-1,2-dioxetane phenyl phosphate substrate for alkaline phosphatase. The luminescent signal from the hybrid formation was detected, analyzed, and measured with a high performance, low light level imaging luminograph apparatus connected to an optical microscope and to a personal computer for quantitative image analysis. Increasing values of emitted photons per second per infected cell, corresponding to the presence of hybridized CMV DNA, could be found in infected cells fixed at various times after infection, following the CMV replication cycle. When the assay was performed on different clinical samples from patients with acute CMV infections, CMV DNA was detected in all positive samples tested, both in cellular samples and in frozen and paraffin-embedded tissue sections, proving specific and sensitive. The chemiluminescent in situ hybridization assay developed in this work can be a useful tool for a sensitive and specific diagnosis of viral infection and can be easily adapted to detect and study any specific gene sequence inside the cells. The assay may also be promising for an estimation and quantification of nucleic acids present in tissue samples or cellular smears and for imaging gene expression in cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8644853PMC1861525W147748110What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.