Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8644721›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1996

Lack of interest by nonpregnant couples in population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

E W Clayton, V L Hannig, J P Pfotenhauer, R A Parker, P W Campbell, J A Phillips

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. State-offered ethnically targeted reproductive genetic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Religious and spiritual issues in medical genetics.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2009
    Article
  19. God and genes in the caring professions: clinician and clergy perceptions of religion and genetics.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2009
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E W ClaytonDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
V L Hannig
J P Pfotenhauer
R A Parker
P W Campbell
J A Phillips
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

CYSTIC FIBROSIS SCREENING: AN ALTERNATIVE PARADIGMR01HG000638 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS III, JOHN ATLAS · 1991 to 1993
–
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R01 HG00638-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used signs and letters to offer free cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening to nonpregnant adults in stable relationships who visited numerous clinical and nonclinical sites in Nashville. A total of 179 individuals (<<1% of those eligible) elected to be tested. To understand this observation, we used questionnaires to assess individuals' attitudes about genetic testing in general and about CF carrier screening in particular (n=873). Participants expressed conflicting views about carrier screening. More than 90% of people thought that genetic testing should at least be available. Most respondents said that the views of their partners and physicians were important in their decision making, and most believed that these others favored genetic testing. Yet, more than two-thirds indicated that such factors as insurability, being "at risk," what they would need to learn, abortion, and religious beliefs were important in their decision making, opinions that mitigated against genetic testing. In particular, one-third feared that carriers would lose their health insurance, one-quarter said that they would have been more interested had they been able to provide DNA by buccal swab rather than by finger stick, and less than one-sixth believed that genetic testing was meddling in God's plan. In the face of both the low level of use of free CF carrier screening by nonpregnant couples when it was not offered in person by health-care professionals and the wide variety of concerns demonstrated, we believe that clinicians should not routinely offer carrier screening to nonpregnant individuals who do not have a family history of CF.

Indexed as

Genetic Carrier ScreeningAdultAttitude to HealthCystic FibrosisFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInformation DisseminationMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTennesseeEmpirical ApproachGenetics and ReproductionHealth Care and Public Health

Identifiers

PMID8644721
PMCPMC1914565
OpenAlexW141290857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.