ArticleInfection and immunity1996
Biochemical and mutational analysis of the histidine residues of staphylococcal enterotoxin A.
Article in Infection and immunity, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Basis of Virulence in Enterotoxin-Mediated Staphylococcal Food Poisoning.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
- The staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) family: SEB and siblings.Virulence · 2013Review
- Review
- Review
- Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin C2 mutants: biological activity assay in vitro.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2008Article
- Superantigen-like effects of a Candida albicans polypeptide.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2008Article
- Identification of a transcytosis epitope on staphylococcal enterotoxins.Infection and immunity · 2002Article
- Pyrogenic toxin superantigen site specificity in toxic shock syndrome and food poisoning in animals.Infection and immunity · 2000Article
- Identification and characterization of staphylococcal enterotoxin types G and I from Staphylococcus aureus.Infection and immunity · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study was to examine the role of histidine residues in the biological activities of staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA). Carboxymethylated SEA was unable to stimulate murine T-cell proliferation but was resistant to monkey stomach lavage fluid degradation, suggesting that native conformation was intact. Site-directed mutagenesis of the histidine residues of SEA was subsequently performed. SEA-H44A (SEA with histidine 44 replaced with alanine), SEA-H44D, SEA-H50A, SEA-H50D, SEA-H114A, SEA-H114D, SEA-H187A, and SEA-H187D retained superantigen and emetic activities, whereas SEA-H225A and SEA-H225D were defective in the ability to stimulate T-cell proliferation. These mutants were unable to compete with SEA for binding to Raji cells, suggesting that the defect in SEA-H225A and SEA-H225D is due to impaired major histocompatibility complex class II binding. SEA-H225D provoked an emetic response in monkeys only if fed at high doses, while SEA-H225A did not provoke an emetic response at low or high doses. In comparison, SEA-H61A and SEA-H61D were defective in emetic activity but not in the ability to stimulate murine T-cell proliferation. Overall, these studies show that the carboxy-terminal histidine at residue position 225 of SEA is important for both the superantigen and emetic activities of this enterotoxin. Histidine 61 appears to be important for emetic activity but not for superantigen activity, consistent with the hypothesis that the two activities are separable in staphylococcal enterotoxins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.