Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8641269›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal1996

Complete nucleotide sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome X.

F Galibert, D Alexandraki, A Baur, E Boles, N Chalwatzis, J C Chuat, F Coster, C Cziepluch, M De Haan, H Domdey and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F GalibertCNRS Recombinaisons Génétiques, Faculté de Médecine, Rennes, France.
D Alexandraki
A Baur
E Boles
N Chalwatzis
J C Chuat
F Coster
C Cziepluch
M De Haan
H Domdey
P Durand
K D Entian
M Gatius
A Goffeau
L A Grivell
A Hennemann
C J Herbert
K Heumann
F Hilger
C P Hollenberg
M E Huang
C Jacq
J C Jauniaux
C Katsoulou
L Karpfinger-Hartl
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complete nucleotide sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome X (745 442 bp) reveals a total of 379 open reading frames (ORFs), the coding region covering approximately 75% of the entire sequence. One hundred and eighteen ORFs (31%) correspond to genes previously identified in S. cerevisiae. All other ORFs represent novel putative yeast genes, whose function will have to be determined experimentally. However, 57 of the latter subset (another 15% of the total) encode proteins that show significant analogy to proteins of known function from yeast or other organisms. The remaining ORFs, exhibiting no significant similarity to any known sequence, amount to 54% of the total. General features of chromosome X are also reported, with emphasis on the nucleotide frequency distribution in the environment of the ATG and stop codons, the possible coding capacity of at least some of the small ORFs (<100 codons) and the significance of 46 non-canonical or unpaired nucleotides in the stems of some of the 24 tRNA genes recognized on this chromosome.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, FungalAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceCentromereChromosome MappingCodon, TerminatorMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyOpen Reading FramesRNA, TransferSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTelomereCodon, TerminatorRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID8641269
PMCPMC450125
OpenAlexW1482147747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.