ArticleDiagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B1995
Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the diagnosis of DiGeorge sequence and related diseases.
Article in Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Genetic counseling, activism and 'genotype-first' diagnosis of developmental disorders.Journal of genetic counseling · 2012Article
- Genomic imbalances in neonates with birth defects: high detection rates by using chromosomal microarray analysis.Pediatrics · 2008Article
- Pilot studies for proficiency testing using fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes: a College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics Program.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The proximal portion of human chromosome 22q has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a clinically diverse group of conditions including DiGeorge sequence (DGS), velocardiofacial syndrome, and CHARGE association as well as isolated conotruncal heart anomalies. Frequently, overlap in the clinical presentation of these syndromes occurs and, recently, the presence of microdeletions on chromosome 22q11.2 with varying frequencies has been demonstrated in these syndromes. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we assessed 20 consecutive patients who were cytogenetically and clinically evaluated for a suspected syndrome that could be due to a microdeletion of chromosome 22q11.2. After cytogenetic testing and full clinical evaluation, we compared the results by FISH with the final clinical diagnosis and karyotype results. We found that microdeletions of 22q11.2 were detected in three of the five patients who were evaluated for DGS. The three cases with microdeletions appeared clinically to have DGS while the two negative cases were more atypical. High-resolution banding techniques did not detect a microdeletion in any of the cases; however, one of the 20 patients had a translocation between chromosomes 13 and 22. This patient also had a microdeletion of 22q11.2 detected by FISH and clinical features of DGS. None of the patients who were evaluated for disorders related to DGS showed microdeletions. We conclude that FISH is a useful, easily applied technique for the diagnosis of 22q11.2 microdeletion syndromes, particularly DGS. This test may also be useful in genetic counseling and in both prenatal and postnatal diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.