Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8633869›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology1996

Xylulose and glucose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in chemostat culture.

H Jeppsson, S Yu, B Hahn-Hägerdal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Marker Assisted Selection of Malic-ConsumingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H JeppssonDepartment of Applied Microbiology, Lund Institute of Technology/University of Lund, Sweden.
S Yu
B Hahn-Hägerdal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 24860 was cultivated in chemostat culture under anoxic conditions with 111.1 mmol of glucose liter-1 alone or with a mixture of 66.7 mmol of xylulose liter-1 and 111.1 mmol of glucose liter-1. The substrate consumption rate was 5.4 mmol g of cells-1 h-1 for glucose, whereas for xylulose it was 1.0 mmol g of cells-1 h-1. The ethanol yield decreased from 0.52 carbon mole of ethanol produced per carbon mole of sugar consumed during the utilization of glucose alone to 0.49 carbon mole produced per carbon mole consumed during the simultaneous utilization of xylulose and glucose, while cell biomass was maintained at 2.04 to 2.10 g liter-1. Xylulose coutilization was accompanied by a shift in product formation from ethanol to acetate and arabinitol. Xylulokinase activity was absent during glucose metabolism but detectable during simultaneous utilization of xylulose and glucose. Xylulose cometabolism resulted in increased in vitro activity of pyruvate decarboxylase and an increased concentration of the intracellular metabolite fructose 1,6-diphosphate without significant changes in the concentrations of 6-phosphogluconate and pyruvate. The results are discussed in relation to (i) altered enzyme activities and (ii) the redox flux of the cell.

Indexed as

GlucoseOxidation-ReductionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSubstrate SpecificityXyloseGlucoseXylose

Identifiers

PMID8633869
PMCPMC167945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.