Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8628283›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1996

Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

J K Moore, J E Haber

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 351 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
351citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

351 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 734 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Role of Arp2/3 in End-Resection During DNA Double-Strand Break Repair.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. eLife · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Chemical Insights into Oxidative and Nitrative Modifications of DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review

291 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J K MooreRosenstiel Center and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254-09110, USA.
J E Haber
Brandeis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, an HO endonuclease-induced double-strand break can be repaired by at least two pathways of nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) that closely resemble events in mammalian cells. In one pathway the chromosome ends are degraded to yield deletions with different sizes whose endpoints have 1 to 6 bp of homology. Alternatively, the 4-bp overhanging 3' ends of HO-cut DNA (5'-AACA-3') are not degraded but can be base paired in misalignment to produce +CA and +ACA insertions. When HO was expressed throughout the cell cycle, the efficiency of NHEJ repair was 30 times higher than when HO was expressed only in G1. The types of repair events were also very different when HO was expressed throughout the cell cycle; 78% of survivors had small insertions, while almost none had large deletions. When HO expression was confined to the G1 phase, only 21% were insertions and 38% had large deletions. These results suggest that there are distinct mechanisms of NHEJ repair producing either insertions or deletions and that these two pathways are differently affected by the time in the cell cycle when HO is expressed. The frequency of NHEJ is unaltered in strains from which RAD1, RAD2, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, or RAD57 is deleted; however, deletions of RAD50, XRS2, or MRE11 reduced NHEJ by more than 70-fold when HO was not cell cycle regulated. Moreover, mutations in these three genes markedly reduced +CA insertions, while significantly increasing the proportion of both small (-ACA) and larger deletion events. In contrast, the rad5O mutation had little effect on the viability of G1-induced cells but significantly reduced the frequency of both +CA insertions and -ACA deletions in favor of larger deletions. Thus, RAD50 (and by extension XRS2 and MRE11) exerts a much more important role in the insertion-producing pathway of NHEJ repair found in S and/or G2 than in the less frequent deletion events that predominate when HO is expressed only in G1.

Indexed as

Cell CycleDNA RepairAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome DeletionChromosomes, FungalCrosses, GeneticDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, FungalGenotypeInfertilityMammalsMolecular Sequence DataSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, FungalHO protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSCEI protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID8628283
PMCPMC231204
OpenAlexW2140289804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.