Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8627765›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology1996

Antiviral cytotoxic T-cell memory by vaccination with recombinant Listeria monocytogenes.

M K Slifka, H Shen, M Matloubian, E R Jensen, J F Miller, R Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Response of Live-Attenuated,Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Disparate roles for STAT5 in primary and secondary CTL responses.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A comparison of T cell memory against the same antigen induced by virus versus intracellular bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M K SlifkaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
H Shen
M Matloubian
E R Jensen
J F Miller
R Ahmed

Funding

T CELL MEMORY TO VIRUSESR01AI030048 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AHMED, RAFI · 1990 to 2022
$5.2M
T CELL MEMORY TO VIRUSESR37AI030048 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI · 2001 to 2010
$3.9M
DEVELOPMENT OF VACCINES AGAINST PAPILLOMAVIRUSESR01CA057922 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WETTSTEIN, FELIX O · 1992 to 1994
–
VIRAL PERSISTENCE: GENETIC &IMMUNOLOGICAL STUDIESR01NS021496 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AHMED, RAFI · 1985 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA57922NIAID NIH HHS AI30048NINDS NIH HHS NS21496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular bacterium that is able to escape phagocytic vesicles and replicate in the cytoplasm of infected cells. As with viral vectors, this intracytoplasmic life cycle provides a means for introducing foreign proteins into the major histocompatibility complex class I pathway of antigen presentation. Using recombinant L. monocytogenes (rLM) strains expressing the full-length nucleoprotein (NP) or a single cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitope from lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), we analyzed antiviral CTL responses induced by rLM vaccination. After vaccination, rLM was cleared from the host within 7 days while inducing an LCMV-specific ex vivo CD8+ effector CTL response. Virus-specific CTL memory was maintained for 6 months postvaccination, as demonstrated by vigorous secondary CTL responses after in vitro stimulation. A single immunization with rLM that expressed either the full-length NP gene or the CTL epitope alone resulted in LCMV NP-specific CTL precursor frequencies of approximately 1/10(4) CD8+ T cells. A second rLM vaccination resulted in enhanced virus-specific CTL activity and in vitro proliferation. rLM-vaccinated mice were protected against chronic viral infection by an accelerated virus-specific memory CTL response. These mice cleared infectious virus as well as viral antigen, suggesting that sterilizing immunity was achieved. In contrast to mice that received wild-type LM, rLM-vaccinated mice were protected from virally induced immunosuppression and splenic atrophy associated with chronic LCMV infection. The ability to elicit long-term cell-mediated immunity is fundamental in designing vaccines against intracellular pathogens, and these results demonstrate the efficacy of recombinant LM vaccination for inducing protective antiviral CTL memory.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryVaccines, SyntheticViral VaccinesAnimalsAntigens, ViralCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChlorocebus aethiopsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IKineticsListeria monocytogenesLiverLymphocyte ActivationLymphocytic ChoriomeningitisLymphocytic choriomeningitis virusMiceMice, Inbred BALB CAntigens, ViralHistocompatibility Antigens Class Inucleoprotein peptide 118-126, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virusNucleoproteinsPeptide FragmentsVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID8627765
PMCPMC190148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.