Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8627667›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology1996

Comparing transcriptional activation and autostimulation by ZEBRA and ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeras.

J L Kolman, N Taylor, L Gradoville, J Countryman, G Miller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Icaritin induces lytic cytotoxicity in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J L KolmanDepartment of Molecular Biophysics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.
N Taylor
L Gradoville
J Countryman
G Miller
Yale University · US

Funding

STUDIES OF EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUSR37CA012055 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, I. GEORGE · 1989 to 2012
$4.4M
STUDIES OF EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUSR01CA012055 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, I. GEORGE · 1985 to 2002
$737k
NCI NIH HHS CA12055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lytic cycle of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can be activated by transfection of the gene for ZEBRA, a viral basic-zipper (bZip) transcriptional activator. ZEBRA and cellular AP-1 bZip activators, such as c-Fos, have homologous DNA-binding domains, and their DNA-binding specificities overlap. Moreover, EBV latency can also be disrupted by phorbol esters, which act, in part, through AP-1 activators. It is not known whether ZEBRA and AP-1 factors play equivalent roles in the initial stages of reactivation. Here the contribution of ZEBRA's basic DNA recognition domain to disruption of latency was analyzed by comparing ZEBRA with chimeric mutants in which the DNA recognition domain of ZEBRA was replaced with the analogous domain of c-Fos. Chimeric ZEBRA/c-Fos proteins overexpressed in Escherichia coli bound DNA with the specificity of c-Fos; they bound a heptamer AP-1 site and an octamer TPA response element (TRE). ZEBRA bound the AP-1 site and an array of ZEBRA response elements (ZREs). In assays with reporter genes, both ZEBRA and ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeric mutants activated transcription from Zp, a promoter of the ZEBRA gene (BZLF1) that contains the TRE and multiple ZREs. However, despite their capacity to activate reporters bearing Zp, neither ZEBRA nor the c-Fos chimeras activated transcription from Zp in the context of the intact latent viral genome. In contrast, ZEBRA but not ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeras activated Rp, a second viral promoter that controls ZEBRA expression. Hence, transcriptional autostimulation by transfected ZEBRA occurred preferentially at Rp. Both ZEBRA and the ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeras activated transcription from reporters with multimerized AP-1 sites. However, in the context of the virus, only ZEBRA activated the promoters of two early lytic cycle genes, BMRF1 and BMLF1, that contain an AP-1 site. Thus, overexpression of an activator that recognized AP-1 and TRE sites was not sufficient to activate EBV early lytic cycle genes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, ViralTranscriptional ActivationViral ProteinsBase SequenceB-LymphocytesCell LineDNADNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coliGenes, ReporterHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRecombinant Fusion ProteinsBZLF1 protein, Herpesvirus 4, HumanDNADNA-Binding ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID8627667
PMCPMC189970
OpenAlexW1554681873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.