ArticleChromosoma1996
The chromatin of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere shows cell-type specific changes.
Article in Chromosoma, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cryo-EM structure of the complete inner kinetochore of the budding yeast point centromere.Science advances · 2023Article
- Kinetochores prevent repair of UV damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeres.Molecular and cellular biology · 2004Article
- Probing the architecture of a simple kinetochore using DNA-protein crosslinking.The Journal of cell biology · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have analysed the centromeric chromatin from chromosome XIV of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at different stages of mitosis with the help of mutants of the cell division cycle. The pattern of centromeric chromatin in cells arrested using cdc20-1, tub2-401 and cdc15-1 alleles was indistinguishable from that of vegetatively growing cells, indicating that the centromeric complex is constitutively present during mitosis and possibly throughout the entire cell cycle. In contrast chromatin isolated from G0 cells and spores exhibited distinct differences in centromeric chromatin probably due to structural rearrangements of the centromeric complex. In particular the alterations found in spores are indicative of an inactive centromeric complex. The differences in centromeric chromatin in spores do not reflect a general reorganisation of the chromatin in this cell type, as the chromatin structure of the PHO3/PHO5 locus in spores was found to be identical to that in vegetative cells under repressed conditions. Thus the structural analysis of the centromere in different cell types provides evidence about the requirement of CEN DNA/protein complexes in different cell types and in different stages of the cell cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.