Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8625421›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics1996

Electron microscopic investigation of mitochondrial DNA from Chenopodium album (L.).

S Backert, R Lurz, T Börner

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DNA Repair and the Stability of the Plant Mitochondrial Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S BackertInstitut für Biologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany.
R Lurz
T Börner
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA molecules from mitochondria of whole plants and a suspension culture of Chenopodium album were prepared, by a gentle method, for analysis by electron microscopy. Mitochondrial (mt) DNA preparations from both sources contained mostly linear molecules of variable sizes (with the majority of molecules ranging from 40 to 160 kb). Open circular molecules with contour lengths corresponding to 0. 3-183 kb represented 23-26% of all mtDNA molecules in the preparations from the suspension culture and 13-15% in the preparations from whole plants. More than 90% of the circular DNA was smaller than 30 kb. Virtually no size classes of the mtDNA molecules could be identified, and circular or linear molecules of the genome size (about 270 kb) were not observed. In contrast, plastid (pt) DNA preparations from the suspension culture contained linear and circular molecules falling into size classes corresponding to monomers, dimers and trimers of the chromosome. About 23% of the ptDNA molecules were circular. DNA preparations from mitochondria contained a higher percentage of more complex molecules (rosette-like structures, catenate-like molecules) than preparations of ptDNA. Sigma-like molecules (putative intermediates of rolling-circle replication) were observed in mtDNA preparations from the suspension culture (18% of the circles), and in much lower amount (1%) in preparations from whole plants. The results are compared with data obtained previously by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and discussed in relation to the structural organization and replication of the mt genome of higher plants.

Indexed as

ArtifactsCells, CulturedDNA, ChloroplastDNA, CircularDNA, MitochondrialDNA, PlantElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldMicroscopy, ElectronPlantsDNA, ChloroplastDNA, CircularDNA, MitochondrialDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID8625421
OpenAlexW1988582871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.